William & Mary or Colby for economics: which is better for an undergraduate economics major?

I’m trying to narrow down my college list and I keep bouncing between William & Mary and Colby for economics. I’m interested in studying economics as an undergrad and want a place where the major is strong and students get solid academic support.

I’m mainly trying to understand which school tends to be the better choice specifically for an economics major.
0 views
College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Sundial AI
AI-assisted guidance informed by the expertise of Sundial's admissions advisors
The biggest practical tradeoff is size and style: William & Mary offers a larger, more established economics presence with more course variety and a clearer pre-professional pipeline, while Colby gives you a smaller liberal arts setting with tighter faculty access and a more intimate classroom experience. For economics specifically, William & Mary has a long-standing, well-known economics department and benefits from being a university where the field is a central part of the social sciences. Colby’s economics program is respected, but it is housed in a smaller liberal arts environment, so the experience can feel more personalized but somewhat narrower in sheer scale.

If your priority is the strongest undergraduate economics platform itself, William & Mary usually has the edge. You are more likely to find broader upper-level offerings, a larger network of economics students, and more visible connections to policy, government, and consulting-related paths because of the school’s overall ecosystem. That can matter if you want flexibility within the major, such as trying econometrics, public policy-oriented work, finance-adjacent electives, or independent research with multiple faculty in different subfields.

Colby’s advantage is support and access. At a place its size, economics students often get close mentorship from professors, and the liberal arts structure can make advising feel more personal. That is a real plus if you learn best through discussion-heavy classes and want professors to know you well early on. The tradeoff is that smaller departments can mean fewer total electives or less redundancy in specialized areas from year to year.

For academic support, both schools do well, but in different ways. Colby may feel more hands-on day to day, while William & Mary may give you more academic depth and peer infrastructure within the major. If the question is narrowly which school is better for undergraduate economics, I would lean William & Mary. If what you really mean is economics in the most personal, small-college academic setting possible, Colby becomes much more compelling.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!

Comments & Questions (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to ask a question or share your thoughts!

Start the conversation

Have a follow-up question or want to share your experience? Leave a comment below.

College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!