Boston University vs University of Richmond for economics: which is better for undergrads?

For undergraduate economics, Boston University has the edge if you want a larger, more research-driven department with stronger access to internships and employer networks, while the University of Richmond stands out for closer faculty attention and a more intimate academic experience. Richmond gives undergrads easier access to professors, smaller classes, and a campus culture that can make advising feel more personal.

One major difference is the scale and depth of the academic program. If you are the kind of student who wants options like advanced theory, econometrics, international economics, or faculty-led research in a large university setting, BU usually offers more room to explore.

Another real separator is location. Being in Boston gives BU students access to internships during the semester in finance, consulting, government, nonprofits, and research organizations, not just in the summer. That can make a meaningful difference for building a resume early, especially in economics where work experience often complements the major well.

Richmond’s advantage is support. It is much easier there to build close relationships with professors, get individualized advising, and stand out in class. For grad school applicants, that can translate into stronger recommendation letters and more direct mentoring, especially if you thrive in smaller discussion-based environments rather than large lecture courses.

If your top priority is breadth, city-based opportunity, and a bigger economics platform, BU comes out ahead. If your priority is hands-on support and a smaller undergraduate experience where professors know you well, Richmond makes a compelling case.