University of Copenhagen vs University of Edinburgh for history: which is better for an undergraduate history degree?

I’m trying to decide between these two universities for studying history as an undergraduate. Both seem strong, but I’m having trouble telling which one would be the better fit for history specifically.

I want to compare them based on the overall strength of the history program, academic reputation in the subject, and the kind of experience a history student would actually get.
2 hours ago
 • 
0 views
Sundial Team
2 hours ago
The biggest practical tradeoff is breadth and language of study versus cost and Scandinavian setting. For undergraduate history taught in English, the University of Edinburgh is the much clearer option because it offers a full history degree structure in English, a large history department, and a wider range of course choices across periods and regions. The University of Copenhagen is an excellent university, but for a full undergraduate history degree it is far less straightforward for international students because most bachelor’s programs are taught in Danish.

On history specifically, Edinburgh has the stronger and more visible undergraduate setup. Its School of History, Classics and Archaeology is well established, and history students typically have access to substantial choice in areas like Scottish, British, European, imperial, global, and intellectual history. That matters at the undergraduate level because your experience is shaped less by abstract reputation and more by whether you can actually take varied seminars, find faculty in your interests, and build a coherent degree in your language of study.

Copenhagen has a strong academic reputation overall and serious research strength in the humanities, but that does not automatically translate into a better undergraduate experience for an English-speaking history student. The key issue is access: if you are not prepared to study largely in Danish, Copenhagen is not really an equal comparison for a bachelor’s in history. If you do speak Danish or plan to become highly proficient, then Copenhagen becomes more viable and can offer a rigorous academic environment in a city with excellent archives, museums, and a distinctive Nordic historical perspective.

In terms of student experience, Edinburgh is likely to feel more immediately built for what you want. The city itself is unusually strong for history students, with deep historical character, major libraries and collections, and a university culture where history is a central subject rather than a niche option. The undergraduate system also tends to allow more room to explore related fields early on before narrowing your focus.

Comments & Questions (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to ask a question or share your thoughts!

Start the conversation

Have a follow-up question or want to share your experience? Leave a comment below.

Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!