Princeton vs Northwestern for economics: which is better for undergraduate economics?
I’m trying to narrow down my college list and both of these schools keep coming up for economics. I know they’re both strong overall, but I’m mostly interested in the undergraduate experience for someone who wants to study economics seriously.
I’m trying to understand which one tends to be better for econ students in terms of academics, recruiting, and overall opportunities.
I’m trying to understand which one tends to be better for econ students in terms of academics, recruiting, and overall opportunities.
4 hours ago
•
0 views
Sundial Team
4 hours ago
The biggest practical tradeoff is Princeton’s smaller, more theory-driven undergraduate experience versus Northwestern’s larger, more flexible ecosystem with especially strong links to business-adjacent fields. Princeton’s economics department is one of the most respected in the country, the junior paper and senior thesis push undergrads into serious independent work, and the school’s undergraduate focus means faculty access is often a real strength. Northwestern, meanwhile, gives econ students more room to combine economics with areas like statistics, data science, mathematics, and learning and organizational change, and its quarter system can make it easier to explore broadly.
For pure undergraduate economics, Princeton probably has the edge academically. Its program is known for rigor, especially in micro, macro, and econometrics, and students who like a more analytical, research-oriented approach often find it especially rewarding. The independent research requirements are a major part of that experience, so it is a very good place for someone who wants to think like an economist rather than just major in econ.
Northwestern is still excellent, but the experience can feel more interdisciplinary and preprofessional. Econ students benefit from the broader Northwestern environment, including strong quantitative departments and access to Kellogg-related energy even though undergrads are not in the MBA program. That can be appealing for students interested in consulting, finance, analytics, or blending economics with policy, journalism, or technology.
On recruiting, both place very well for consulting, finance, graduate school, and other selective paths. Princeton’s brand and alumni network are exceptionally powerful, and it tends to punch above its size in elite recruiting. Northwestern is also heavily recruited, especially given its Chicago-area location and strong employer access, and it may feel slightly more connected to internships during the school year.
If the question is specifically which is better for undergraduate economics, I would lean Princeton. It is harder to beat if you want a deeply academic econ education with close faculty engagement and a department that is central to the undergraduate experience. I’d put Northwestern ahead only if you want a more flexible, cross-disciplinary path or think you may want your econ major to sit alongside a more visibly preprofessional college experience.
For pure undergraduate economics, Princeton probably has the edge academically. Its program is known for rigor, especially in micro, macro, and econometrics, and students who like a more analytical, research-oriented approach often find it especially rewarding. The independent research requirements are a major part of that experience, so it is a very good place for someone who wants to think like an economist rather than just major in econ.
Northwestern is still excellent, but the experience can feel more interdisciplinary and preprofessional. Econ students benefit from the broader Northwestern environment, including strong quantitative departments and access to Kellogg-related energy even though undergrads are not in the MBA program. That can be appealing for students interested in consulting, finance, analytics, or blending economics with policy, journalism, or technology.
On recruiting, both place very well for consulting, finance, graduate school, and other selective paths. Princeton’s brand and alumni network are exceptionally powerful, and it tends to punch above its size in elite recruiting. Northwestern is also heavily recruited, especially given its Chicago-area location and strong employer access, and it may feel slightly more connected to internships during the school year.
If the question is specifically which is better for undergraduate economics, I would lean Princeton. It is harder to beat if you want a deeply academic econ education with close faculty engagement and a department that is central to the undergraduate experience. I’d put Northwestern ahead only if you want a more flexible, cross-disciplinary path or think you may want your econ major to sit alongside a more visibly preprofessional college experience.
Comments & Questions (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to ask a question or share your thoughts!
Start the conversation
Have a follow-up question or want to share your experience? Leave a comment below.
Related Questions
Students also ask…
Princeton vs Amherst for economics: which is better for undergraduate econ students?
Princeton vs Northwestern for public policy: which school is better for an undergraduate interested in public policy?
Princeton vs Harvard for liberal arts: which is better for an undergraduate humanities education?
Which is better for journalism: Princeton or Northwestern?
Princeton or Brown for economics: which is better for undergrads?
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!