Boston College vs. William & Mary for economics: which is better for an undergraduate economics major?

I’m trying to compare Boston College and William & Mary specifically for economics as an undergrad. I’m interested in which school tends to be stronger for the major itself, including the quality of classes, faculty access, and overall academic reputation in economics.

I know both are respected schools, but I’m having trouble telling which one would be the better fit for studying economics seriously.
15 hours ago
 • 
0 views
Sundial Team
15 hours ago
For an undergraduate economics major, both Boston College and William & Mary are strong, but they tend to appeal to somewhat different students. Boston College is especially attractive if you want economics in a university setting with stronger ties to finance, business-adjacent recruiting, and a major city job market. William & Mary stands out if you want a more purely academic, undergraduate-focused environment where close faculty interaction and a discussion-heavy classroom culture are central to the experience.

Boston College’s economics department is well regarded, and being in the Boston area matters in practical ways. You are closer to internships during the academic year, alumni networks in finance and consulting, and a broader set of economics-related employers. For a student who wants econ not just as a theory discipline but also as a pathway into private sector work, BC often feels more connected to those outcomes.

William & Mary often appeals more to students who want the major itself to feel intimate and intellectually serious. Its undergraduate focus is real, and many students find that professors are highly accessible and teaching is a major priority. If you like the idea of smaller academic communities, close mentorship, and a campus culture where academics are very central, W&M has a strong edge in feel.

In terms of classroom experience, I’d lean toward William & Mary for students who care most about close discussion, faculty attention, and a traditional liberal arts approach to economics. I’d lean toward Boston College for students who want excellent academics but also value the surrounding city, broader pre-professional energy, and easier access to internships while in school.

On reputation, both carry real respect, but in somewhat different circles. Boston College may have more visibility with employers in the Northeast, especially in finance-oriented spaces. William & Mary has a longstanding academic reputation and is often especially appreciated by students who may consider research, policy, or graduate study.

So the answer depends on what “better” means to you. For pure undergraduate academic attention within economics, William & Mary has a very compelling case. For economics plus stronger urban access, career adjacency, and Boston-area opportunities, Boston College may be the more advantageous place to study it.

Comments & Questions (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to ask a question or share your thoughts!

Start the conversation

Have a follow-up question or want to share your experience? Leave a comment below.

Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!