UCLA vs Brown for economics: which is better for undergrads?
I’m trying to decide between UCLA and Brown for studying economics, and I’m having a hard time telling which one is the stronger choice for undergrad. I care about the quality of the econ department, research opportunities, and how well the school sets students up for internships or grad school.
I know both are strong schools overall, but I’m mainly trying to understand which one has the better economics program and environment for an undergraduate student.
I know both are strong schools overall, but I’m mainly trying to understand which one has the better economics program and environment for an undergraduate student.
20 hours ago
•
0 views
Sundial Team
20 hours ago
The biggest practical tradeoff is scale versus flexibility. UCLA gives you a larger, more structured economics ecosystem with more faculty breadth, more nearby industry access through Los Angeles, and a bigger volume of student organizations and recruiting activity. Brown offers a smaller undergraduate environment, easier access to professors for many students, and far more curricular freedom through the Open Curriculum.
For economics specifically, UCLA has a very established department with strong visibility in both traditional economics and business-oriented paths that undergrads often care about, especially if you want a large menu of upper-level courses and a campus culture where many students are aiming at finance, consulting, policy, or data-heavy roles. Being in LA also helps with internships during the school year, not just summers. That location advantage is real for networking, part-time internships, and alumni reach in California.
Brown’s economics department is also excellent, but the undergraduate experience tends to feel more intimate and self-directed. If you like the idea of combining econ with math, computer science, public policy, philosophy, or something less conventional, Brown makes that unusually easy. For research, Brown can be very good precisely because the school is smaller, so strong students often find it easier to build direct faculty relationships earlier.
On grad school preparation, either school can get you there, but the path looks a little different. UCLA may be especially appealing if you want rigorous quantitative training within a large research university and access to many advanced courses. Brown can be especially attractive if you want close mentoring, a lot of intellectual independence, and room to shape a distinctive academic profile.
If the question is which undergraduate economics program gives more overall opportunity at scale, I’d lean UCLA. If the question is which school may provide the more personalized and flexible undergraduate experience while still being excellent in economics, I’d pick Brown. For most students choosing strictly on undergrad environment rather than name alone, Brown often has the edge unless UCLA’s larger department and LA internship access are exactly what you want.
For economics specifically, UCLA has a very established department with strong visibility in both traditional economics and business-oriented paths that undergrads often care about, especially if you want a large menu of upper-level courses and a campus culture where many students are aiming at finance, consulting, policy, or data-heavy roles. Being in LA also helps with internships during the school year, not just summers. That location advantage is real for networking, part-time internships, and alumni reach in California.
Brown’s economics department is also excellent, but the undergraduate experience tends to feel more intimate and self-directed. If you like the idea of combining econ with math, computer science, public policy, philosophy, or something less conventional, Brown makes that unusually easy. For research, Brown can be very good precisely because the school is smaller, so strong students often find it easier to build direct faculty relationships earlier.
On grad school preparation, either school can get you there, but the path looks a little different. UCLA may be especially appealing if you want rigorous quantitative training within a large research university and access to many advanced courses. Brown can be especially attractive if you want close mentoring, a lot of intellectual independence, and room to shape a distinctive academic profile.
If the question is which undergraduate economics program gives more overall opportunity at scale, I’d lean UCLA. If the question is which school may provide the more personalized and flexible undergraduate experience while still being excellent in economics, I’d pick Brown. For most students choosing strictly on undergrad environment rather than name alone, Brown often has the edge unless UCLA’s larger department and LA internship access are exactly what you want.
Comments & Questions (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to ask a question or share your thoughts!
Start the conversation
Have a follow-up question or want to share your experience? Leave a comment below.
Related Questions
Students also ask…
Michigan vs UCLA for economics: which is better for an undergraduate economics major?
Duke or Carnegie Mellon for economics: which is the better choice for an undergraduate degree?
UCLA vs Duke for undergraduate research opportunities: which school is better?
UCLA vs Stanford for computer science: which is the better choice for undergrad?
Which is better for business, UCLA or Cornell?
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!