UPenn vs Tufts for international relations: which is better for undergrad students interested in IR careers?
I’m a high school senior trying to decide between UPenn and Tufts, and I want to study international relations as an undergrad. Both schools seem strong, but I’m having trouble figuring out which one is a better fit for someone who wants to go into IR-related work after college.
I’m mostly trying to compare the overall experience for an IR student, including academics, advising, and opportunities outside class.
I’m mostly trying to compare the overall experience for an IR student, including academics, advising, and opportunities outside class.
0 views
College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Sundial AI
AI-assisted guidance informed by the expertise of Sundial's admissions advisors
The biggest practical tradeoff is this: Penn gives you a larger university with more cross-school options and a very broad professional network, while Tufts offers a more concentrated international relations culture where IR is one of the school’s clearest undergraduate strengths. For an undergrad focused specifically on IR, Tufts tends to feel more intentionally built around that interest, especially because of its long-standing reputation in international affairs and the influence of the Fletcher community nearby. Penn, though, can be especially appealing if you want to combine IR with economics, business, data, public policy, or regional studies in a highly flexible way.
At Tufts, the academic experience for IR students is unusually visible and undergraduate-facing. The International Relations major is a signature program, and the campus culture includes a lot of students aiming at diplomacy, development, global policy, NGOs, and related work. That often translates into relevant student groups, policy discussions, faculty attention, and peers who are serious about global affairs rather than treating it as a side interest.
At Penn, IR students benefit from the scale of the university and the ability to draw from departments and schools that matter for real-world IR careers. Courses and connections in political science, economics, language study, area studies, public policy, and even Wharton can be valuable if you are interested in international political economy, consulting with a global focus, development finance, or policy analysis. Penn’s Philadelphia location also creates access to internships during the year, though Tufts benefits from the Boston-area ecosystem and proximity to a major graduate school in international affairs.
For advising and outside-the-classroom opportunities, Tufts often has the edge in focus, while Penn often has the edge in breadth. Tufts can make it easier to feel plugged into an IR pipeline early as an undergraduate. Penn may require a bit more initiative to assemble your own version of an IR path, but the payoff can be a wider set of tools and networks.
If your main goal is an undergraduate experience centered on international relations itself, I would lean Tufts. If you want IR plus stronger access to interdisciplinary and preprofessional options, especially business or policy-adjacent work, Penn is the more versatile choice.
At Tufts, the academic experience for IR students is unusually visible and undergraduate-facing. The International Relations major is a signature program, and the campus culture includes a lot of students aiming at diplomacy, development, global policy, NGOs, and related work. That often translates into relevant student groups, policy discussions, faculty attention, and peers who are serious about global affairs rather than treating it as a side interest.
At Penn, IR students benefit from the scale of the university and the ability to draw from departments and schools that matter for real-world IR careers. Courses and connections in political science, economics, language study, area studies, public policy, and even Wharton can be valuable if you are interested in international political economy, consulting with a global focus, development finance, or policy analysis. Penn’s Philadelphia location also creates access to internships during the year, though Tufts benefits from the Boston-area ecosystem and proximity to a major graduate school in international affairs.
For advising and outside-the-classroom opportunities, Tufts often has the edge in focus, while Penn often has the edge in breadth. Tufts can make it easier to feel plugged into an IR pipeline early as an undergraduate. Penn may require a bit more initiative to assemble your own version of an IR path, but the payoff can be a wider set of tools and networks.
If your main goal is an undergraduate experience centered on international relations itself, I would lean Tufts. If you want IR plus stronger access to interdisciplinary and preprofessional options, especially business or policy-adjacent work, Penn is the more versatile choice.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!
Comments & Questions (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to ask a question or share your thoughts!
Start the conversation
Have a follow-up question or want to share your experience? Leave a comment below.
Related Questions
Students also ask…
UPenn vs MIT for biology: which is better for an undergrad interested in biology research?
UPenn vs UCLA for business: which is better for undergrad career opportunities?
Brown vs Barnard for economics: which is the better choice for an undergrad interested in econ?
Is UPenn or Rice better for finance careers?
UPenn vs Brown for finance careers: which is better for breaking into finance?
College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!