Is UC Berkeley or Stanford harder to get into?
I keep hearing different things from people at school, and I’m trying to understand how selective each one really is. I know both are super competitive, but I’m not sure how to compare them in a meaningful way.
I’m mainly asking about which school is generally harder to get into overall.
I’m mainly asking about which school is generally harder to get into overall.
1 day ago
•
0 views
Sundial Team
1 day ago
Stanford is harder to get into overall. In the broadest sense, Stanford admits a smaller share of applicants and has a more uniformly selective applicant pool across majors, while UC Berkeley is extremely competitive but admits a larger number of students because it is a much bigger public university. Berkeley also has variation by college or program, so some paths are tougher than others, but overall Stanford remains the more difficult admit.
One concrete difference is scale. UC Berkeley enrolls far more undergraduates than Stanford, so even though Berkeley gets a huge number of applications and is very selective, it still has many more seats to fill. Stanford’s undergraduate class is much smaller, which makes each available spot more limited from the start.
Another difference is who applies and how applications are evaluated. Stanford draws a heavily self-selecting national and international pool packed with students who have top grades, rigorous coursework, and standout extracurricular profiles. Berkeley’s pool is also very strong, especially for California residents and high-demand colleges like Engineering or Haas pathways, but it includes a wider range of applicants because of its public mission and larger systemwide reach.
The admissions structure matters too. At Berkeley, selectivity can shift depending on the college, intended major, and residency context, so “how hard” can look different for different applicants. Stanford is simply at the highest level of selectivity across the board, so if the question is which one is harder to get into overall, the answer is Stanford.
One concrete difference is scale. UC Berkeley enrolls far more undergraduates than Stanford, so even though Berkeley gets a huge number of applications and is very selective, it still has many more seats to fill. Stanford’s undergraduate class is much smaller, which makes each available spot more limited from the start.
Another difference is who applies and how applications are evaluated. Stanford draws a heavily self-selecting national and international pool packed with students who have top grades, rigorous coursework, and standout extracurricular profiles. Berkeley’s pool is also very strong, especially for California residents and high-demand colleges like Engineering or Haas pathways, but it includes a wider range of applicants because of its public mission and larger systemwide reach.
The admissions structure matters too. At Berkeley, selectivity can shift depending on the college, intended major, and residency context, so “how hard” can look different for different applicants. Stanford is simply at the highest level of selectivity across the board, so if the question is which one is harder to get into overall, the answer is Stanford.
Comments & Questions (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to ask a question or share your thoughts!
Start the conversation
Have a follow-up question or want to share your experience? Leave a comment below.
Related Questions
Students also ask…
Is UC Berkeley or Rice harder to get into for college admissions?
What is the best UC Berkeley application strategy for out-of-state students?
How do I apply for a UC Berkeley research summer internship as a high school student?
How should a first-generation low-income applicant approach the UC Berkeley application?
Can a UC Berkeley applicant submit an art portfolio, and if so, how is it used in admissions?
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!