WashU or Emory for public health: which school is the better fit for an undergraduate student interested in public health?

I’m a high school senior trying to choose between WashU and Emory, and public health is the main thing I want to study. I know both schools have strong academics, but I’m having trouble figuring out which one is generally the better fit for an undergrad interested in public health.

I’m mostly trying to understand which school gives students a stronger overall public health experience, both in classes and in opportunities outside the classroom.
2 days ago
 • 
0 views
Sundial Team
2 days ago
The biggest practical tradeoff is direct access versus campus integration. Emory gives undergraduates unusually close proximity to one of the country’s most important public health ecosystems through Atlanta, the CDC, and Emory’s Rollins School of Public Health, while WashU offers a very strong health-focused environment but is better known at the undergraduate level for pre-med, research, and interdisciplinary science than for a distinctly undergraduate public health identity.

For an undergrad who already knows public health is the main academic interest, Emory usually has the clearer edge. Emory’s location matters a lot here: being in Atlanta creates more obvious pathways into internships, policy work, community health organizations, and population-health experiences during the school year, not just over the summer. Rollins also gives the university a deep bench in epidemiology, global health, behavioral sciences, and health policy, which tends to make public health feel central rather than adjacent.

WashU is still excellent, especially if your interests lean more toward the science side of health, medical research, or combining public health with biology, anthropology, or policy. It has strong advising, serious research infrastructure, and good access to hospitals and community engagement in St. Louis. But for many students, WashU’s public health opportunities can feel more assembled across departments, whereas Emory’s are often easier to see and pursue as part of the university’s broader identity.

Outside the classroom, Emory also stands out because public health work there can connect naturally to infectious disease, global health, health equity, and urban health through nearby institutions and faculty networks. That can make it easier to build a resume with relevant internships and applied experience before graduation. WashU students can absolutely do meaningful public health work too, but Emory’s surrounding ecosystem is harder to match.

If public health is truly the center of your college decision, I would lean Emory. WashU becomes more compelling if you want a broader health-sciences environment and are not certain public health itself will remain your main focus.

Comments & Questions (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to ask a question or share your thoughts!

Start the conversation

Have a follow-up question or want to share your experience? Leave a comment below.

Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!