UPenn vs. UMass Amherst for economics: which is better for undergrad opportunities and outcomes?

I’m trying to decide between these two schools and economics is the main thing I want to study. I know UPenn has a strong reputation overall, but UMass Amherst also seems to have a solid econ program and would be a lot more affordable for me.

I’m mostly wondering which one gives undergrads better access to classes, internships, research, and job opportunities in economics.
2 days ago
 • 
0 views
Sundial Team
2 days ago
For economics, Penn offers noticeably stronger undergraduate access to high-powered recruiting, alumni networks, and cross-school opportunities, especially if you may want finance, consulting, policy, or quantitative econ paths. UMass Amherst has a respected economics department and can absolutely lead to strong outcomes, but the opportunities tend to require more self-direction and hustle, especially for internships during the school year. If the price gap is modest and affordable, Penn usually opens more doors more quickly; if UMass is dramatically cheaper, that cost difference matters a lot.

Penn is the better environment for a student who wants dense opportunity built into the campus. Economics students can benefit from being at a university with Wharton, a major urban location, and a very active alumni base in New York, Philadelphia, DC, and beyond. Even outside Wharton, Penn undergrads often have easier proximity to employers, more frequent campus recruiting, and more chances to connect economics with data science, business, public policy, or research institutes.

Penn also tends to be stronger for students who want research access early. There are many faculty, centers, and interdisciplinary programs where undergrads can plug in, and the scale of employer and graduate-school visibility is simply higher. For careers in investment banking, consulting, economic research, and certain policy tracks, Penn’s name and network carry real weight.

UMass Amherst fits a student who is cost-conscious, independent, and comfortable creating their own path. Its econ department is well known in some academic circles, including heterodox and policy-oriented areas, and students can still find research, honors work, and solid preparation for grad school or applied careers. The challenge is not lack of quality so much as weaker built-in recruiting and less immediate access to major internships during the semester compared with Penn.

If you would need significant loans for Penn, that changes the calculation. Economics does not guarantee a high-paying outcome straight out of college, so avoiding heavy debt can be the smarter move even if Penn offers more opportunity. But purely on undergrad access to classes, internships, research, and early-career outcomes in economics, Penn has the edge quite clearly.

Comments & Questions (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to ask a question or share your thoughts!

Start the conversation

Have a follow-up question or want to share your experience? Leave a comment below.

Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!