Is UMass Amherst or the University of Richmond better for finance majors?

I’m trying to decide between UMass Amherst and the University of Richmond and finance is the main major I’m interested in. I know both schools are respected, but I’m not sure which one would give me a stronger path for internships, recruiting, and getting a solid first job in finance.

I’m mostly looking for a general comparison of the finance program, alumni network, and career outcomes for someone who wants to work in business after college.
2 days ago
 • 
0 views
Sundial Team
2 days ago
For finance specifically, the University of Richmond usually offers the more direct and polished path into competitive business recruiting, while UMass Amherst can work very well for a student who is more cost-conscious, self-directed, and comfortable creating opportunities in a larger environment. Richmond’s Robins School of Business is a clear undergraduate business school with strong advising, smaller classes, and a tighter alumni network. UMass Amherst has more scale, more students, and solid resources, but finance recruiting tends to feel less concentrated and more dependent on how proactively you use the system.

Richmond makes the most sense for a student who wants close faculty access, a residential campus with a lot of personal attention, and business recruiting that feels more structured. The smaller-school setting can matter a lot in finance because networking, recommendation quality, and access to internships often come through relationships, not just coursework.

UMass Amherst fits a student who wants the energy and options of a large public university and is comfortable standing out in a bigger crowd. The Isenberg School of Management has a strong reputation in business, and there are definitely successful outcomes in finance, especially for students who join the right clubs, pursue internships early, and network aggressively. You may need to be more intentional at UMass about finding mentorship and building recruiter connections, but the scale of the university can also mean more organizations, more peers, and broader campus resources.

For first-job outcomes, Richmond often has an advantage for students targeting traditional finance pathways because the school’s size and business-school culture can make recruiting feel more personal and efficient. UMass can absolutely lead to strong business careers too, but it tends to reward hustle more heavily. If cost is similar, Richmond would be the more compelling choice for finance. If UMass is meaningfully cheaper, it becomes a very reasonable option, especially for a student confident about taking initiative.

Comments & Questions (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to ask a question or share your thoughts!

Start the conversation

Have a follow-up question or want to share your experience? Leave a comment below.

Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!