Harvard vs Princeton for economics: which is better for undergrads interested in econ?
I’m trying to decide between Harvard and Princeton and economics is the main major I’m considering. I know both schools are extremely strong overall, but I’m trying to understand which one is generally a better fit for an undergraduate who wants to study econ seriously.
I’m mostly looking at the strength of the department, the quality of teaching, and how the major feels as an undergrad.
I’m mostly looking at the strength of the department, the quality of teaching, and how the major feels as an undergrad.
4 days ago
•
0 views
Sundial Team
4 days ago
The biggest practical tradeoff is scale and style: Harvard gives you a larger, more sprawling economics ecosystem with exceptional access to faculty, research centers, and cross-registration, while Princeton tends to offer a more tightly undergraduate-focused experience where the department can feel more intimate and the senior thesis is a central part of the major.
For an undergrad who wants economics to be a serious academic focus, Princeton often stands out because undergraduate teaching and advising are especially central to the school’s identity. The economics major there is very well established, quantitatively rigorous, and shaped by the expectation that students will produce substantial independent work. That can make the major feel more cohesive and intellectually demanding in a distinctly undergraduate way.
Harvard’s economics department is also outstanding, but the feel is different. It is larger, offers enormous breadth in fields and faculty, and benefits from the wider Harvard ecosystem, including the Kennedy School, Business School environment nearby, and a huge number of seminars and research opportunities. For some students, that creates more flexibility and more ways to connect econ with government, statistics, computer science, or public policy.
On teaching quality, both schools are strong, but Princeton has a particularly strong reputation for making undergraduates a priority. Harvard absolutely has excellent teaching too, though in a larger department the experience can vary more by course and professor, and you may need to be a bit more proactive to make a big place feel personal.
In terms of how the major feels day to day, Princeton economics is often described as structured, rigorous, and thesis-driven. Harvard economics can feel broader and more customizable, with more room to explore neighboring fields and a wider range of course pathways.
If the question is specifically which school is better for an undergraduate who wants a serious, close-knit, academically centered economics experience, I’d lean Princeton. If you want the biggest possible econ universe and expect to take advantage of a wider network of courses, institutes, and interdisciplinary options, Harvard has a real edge.
For an undergrad who wants economics to be a serious academic focus, Princeton often stands out because undergraduate teaching and advising are especially central to the school’s identity. The economics major there is very well established, quantitatively rigorous, and shaped by the expectation that students will produce substantial independent work. That can make the major feel more cohesive and intellectually demanding in a distinctly undergraduate way.
Harvard’s economics department is also outstanding, but the feel is different. It is larger, offers enormous breadth in fields and faculty, and benefits from the wider Harvard ecosystem, including the Kennedy School, Business School environment nearby, and a huge number of seminars and research opportunities. For some students, that creates more flexibility and more ways to connect econ with government, statistics, computer science, or public policy.
On teaching quality, both schools are strong, but Princeton has a particularly strong reputation for making undergraduates a priority. Harvard absolutely has excellent teaching too, though in a larger department the experience can vary more by course and professor, and you may need to be a bit more proactive to make a big place feel personal.
In terms of how the major feels day to day, Princeton economics is often described as structured, rigorous, and thesis-driven. Harvard economics can feel broader and more customizable, with more room to explore neighboring fields and a wider range of course pathways.
If the question is specifically which school is better for an undergraduate who wants a serious, close-knit, academically centered economics experience, I’d lean Princeton. If you want the biggest possible econ universe and expect to take advantage of a wider network of courses, institutes, and interdisciplinary options, Harvard has a real edge.
Comments & Questions (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to ask a question or share your thoughts!
Start the conversation
Have a follow-up question or want to share your experience? Leave a comment below.
Related Questions
Students also ask…
Williams vs Princeton for economics: which is better for undergrads?
Harvard vs Brown for economics: which is better for undergraduate econ?
Harvard vs Stanford for economics: which is better for undergrad economics?
Harvard vs Yale for economics: which is better for undergraduate economics?
Is Harvard or Princeton better for undergraduate math?
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!